Who is the Devil of the offical documents?

The answer is: The Secretary of the Municipality

This is an official position occupied by lawyers, responsible for the legal quality of the agreements and decissions issued by the Municipality.


But.... what I'm noticing, reading the documents that they send to the official gazzette, is that the level of creativity is very ( too ) high, in the sense that the same protocol ( i.e.: the entitlement of the elected members to replace the Major when being absent ), becomes a possibility for creating mess:

- If one decides to define the substitute number 1, 2, 3.., the other assigns the substitute number 1, while numbers 2 and 3 are names, simply "substitutes"

- If one defines the areas of responsibility, and later assigns an elected members to each area, the other prefers to assign persons to the areas, and only then give the details about the content of the area.


There is no a single act that can be compared from one Municipality to another one.

But, I'm afraid that the worst is still to come:

This morning I have been in the library of the historical archive, searching the remaining information of 1995, and starting to work 1991. The structure of the public documents, is different again, with a rather complicated structure.

(I'm doing it only for pleasure, not for fun, but I can adapt my goals if necessary !!)